The 1,465 housing units permitted during the first six months of 2005
exceeds the second highest year, 2001, by 275 units, or 23% and last year’s
six month total by 669 units or 84%. The permitted value of these units,
excluding land, exceeds the second highest year, 2001, by $115,389,115, or
63%. This year’s total building value falls only $11.1 million short of the
total for the last two years combined.
The major contributors to these enormous increases are the following six
communities: Bella Terra,
Villagio,
Osprey Cove,
Rapallo,
Meadows and
Belle Lago.
The average building value of $203 thousand almost equals 2004 in spite
of the fact that the percentage of single family homes is 24% lower.
REMINDER: The residential building value understates the cost of each
residence because it excludes the value of the underlying land.
Estero's 2005 property tax base grew by a record $860 million. This
increase is almost $240 million larger than our previous high growth period
in 2002. This year’s increase is larger than Estero’s total property tax
base just six years ago. With this year’s housing starts being far ahead of
all prior years and Estero’s commercial growth just getting underway we
would predict that Estero’s 2006 property tax growth will easily exceed $1
billion.
The Lee County Tax Appraiser's preliminary 2005 data shows Estero’s
property tax base to be $4.2 billion. That value is about 10 times what it
was nine years ago in 1996 and nearly four times as large as 5 years ago, in
2000.
As a result of this growth Estero’s tax base is now:
• about 4 percent greater than the City of Fort Myers,
• 37 percent greater than the City of Fort Myers Beach, and
• less than 1 percent smaller than the City of Sanibel.
On July 13th several representatives of Simon Property Group and two of
their developers met with members of the EDRC to present their design plans
for Estero’s largest retail and mixed use development, the
Coconut Point Town Center. The Town Center is a 166 acre parcel on the northeast corner of
Coconut Road and US 41. When complete It will consist of three shopping
areas – The Market, the Lakefront Shops and The Village.
View an Exciting Video of Simon’s Plans for the Coconut Point Town Center
on the web at
www.coconutpointretail.com
Simon began the presentation with a five minute video prepared for the
International Shopping Center Convention. The following details have been
changed since the video was prepared:
• There will be a fountain in the arrival court,
• A dome on the east side of the Village was changed to a tower with a
tile roof,
• Some other changes due to changing tenants and their needs.
Simon stressed that the redesign effort emphasized creating a sense of
variety by using many Mediterranean features. Applicant used many towers as
strong corner elements.
A disk with the drawings of most all of the buildings was provided to
EDRC member Joe McHarris who agreed to make copies for the rest of the
committee to review.
There will be a mixed use area along the east side of the Village with
residential over retail. On the other side of the main street there will
also be office over retail. The first floor retail in these buildings is
higher than usual giving these two story buildings the appearance of being
three stories tall. The view of Main Street is always changing because that
road is designed as an arc rather than a straight street.
Simon will be maintaining the buildings and property as these as leased
spaces.
Pedestrian level decorations (banding, cornices etc.) are made of precast
stucco and stone while those higher up are foam extrusion. The site plan
keeps the rear of most of the buildings from public view.
Kosene and Kosene, the developer, and Wakefield Beasley, their architect,
discussed the residential portion of the project. Kosene is another
Indianapolis, Indiana firm that specializes in urban residential
development. They will be developing seven buildings…three along the Main
Street and four free standing residential buildings, containing a total of
289 units. Parking for all of the units will be under some of the strictly
residential buildings. The project will include 16 floor plans varying in
size from 1,000 to 2,400 square feet under air. Units are expected to sell
for $250,000 to $500,000.
Some other characteristics of The Residences at Coconut Point are:
• Each unit will have a private balcony,
• All the buildings will use the same color schemes and barrel tile
roofs as elsewhere in the town center,
• There will be a clubhouse, pool, spa and exercise area,
• Grillwork, attractive fencing and landscaping will hide the garage
areas,
• The maximum height of the buildings is 45 feet making it difficult to
add towers; however parapets might be possible.
• The design will hide the mechanical equipment on the roof,
• All windows will be hurricane impact resistant,
• Three bridges will connect the residential/retail buildings to the
residential buildings with the under-building parking,
• A question arose as to what people from the
Brooks could see. The
developer stated that site line studies were done and the nearest
residents of The Brooks would not be able to see these buildings,
• The heating and air conditioning system will not require any thru the
wall grills and their condensers will be on the roof.
The Simon Property Group continues to work with the Lee County Sheriff to
locate a substation in the Village. The Market section of the project is due
to open in March 2006 with the balance of the project planned to open in the
fall of 2006.
Simon will return to the EDRC to present its signage, landscape and
lighting plans when the designs are complete. Simon assured the EDRC that
all the designs would satisfy the Coconut Point Design Guidelines approved
by the community and County staff. The landscaping plans will include
street, building and building perimeter planting plans.
Due to increased construction costs the Muvico Theater has been downsized
so that it will now consist of 16, rather than 20, screens and 3,500 seats.
About two thirds of the front of the Theater will be screened from view by
other buildings. There is a 10 foot walkway between the front of the theatre
and the buildings that screen it form view. Simon stated this area would be
a secure area and would be used only as a theatre exit. The Simon Property
Group will be providing security for the entire project. The EDRC was not
impressed by the architecture and design of the Muvico Theater noting that
it’s architecture is different than all the other buildings in the project.
In addition the EDRC stated that the rear of the theatre needs to be better
landscaped. The Muvico representative agreed to return with an architectural
plan more in line with the rest of the shopping center and that has been
coordinated with the overall Simon design and approved by the Simon prior to
resubmission. A detailed landscape plan must also be provided.
The following seven roadway projects are scheduled for construction in
and around Estero during the next two and one-half years. They must stay on
schedule if south Lee County is to avoid even more traffic gridlock over the
next several years as Estero’s residential growth rate increases and our
commercial growth takes off.
With the help of FDOT and Lee DOT staff this and subsequent EDR reports
will identify the key schedule deadlines for each project so that any delays
are observed and corrected as soon as possible.
Construction Underway…Completion Date…August 2005
Construction Underway…the completion date for the segment excluding the
bridge over the Imperial River is January, 2006 with the bridge segment
expected to open in April, 2006
|
Action |
Responsible Party |
Planned Date |
Actual Date |
|
Apply for State Infrastructure Bank (SIB)
Construction Loan |
Regional FDOT |
August 2005 |
|
|
Decision on the SIB Loan Application |
State FDOT |
November 2005 |
|
|
60% Design Complete |
Regional FDOT |
|
Complete 6-05 |
|
Community Meeting |
Regional FDOT |
Fall 2005 |
|
|
90% Design Complete |
Regional FDOT |
Early to mid 2006 |
|
|
ROW Complete |
Regional FDOT |
Early 2007 |
|
|
Start Construction |
Regional FDOT |
|
|
Construction in the new adopted work program is funded in fiscal year
2009/2010, although Florida DOT along with Lee County and the ECCL are
exploring options to advance construction to 2006/2007 when the project will
be production ready.
Today, Florida DOT has $146 million programmed in fiscal year 2007/2008
to six-lane I-75 from Golden Gate Parkway in Collier County to Daniels
Parkway in Lee County. $67 million is programmed to six-lane the interstate
from Daniels Parkway to SR 80 in fiscal year 2009/2010.
In recent years, Florida DOT has made interim interchange improvements
along I-75 to help relieve congestion at interchanges during peak travel
times. Minor interchange improvements are now underway at Corkscrew Road. A
new interchange at I-75/Golden Gate Parkway is under construction that will
provide more direct access to Naples. It is expected to be completed in the
summer of 2007. Cost for this new interchange is $26.5 million.
Major interchange reconstruction starts this week at I-75/Alico. This $32
million job rebuilds and improves the efficiency of one of the most heavily
used interchanges in Southwest Florida. The contractor expects to finish the
job by the end of 2006.
The north end of this segment connects to Three Oaks Parkway at East
Terry Street.
Monthly Progress: Many more properties acquired, now over 60% of
all Right of way (ROW) properties have been acquired.
Important Challenges: Coordinate the engineering firm that is
supporting both the County on this project and the City of Bonita Springs on
the East Terry widening project regarding the intersection designs and ROW
acquisition at the Dean Street and East Terry Street intersections. Satisfy
the South Florida Water Management District’s permit requirements regarding
the overpass over the Imperial River.
|
Action |
Responsible Party |
Current Activity |
Completion/ Date |
|
Complete Dean Street Intersection Design |
Lee DOT & City of Bonita Springs |
Coordinating with Bonita Springs |
|
|
Acquisition of E. Terry Street Intersection
Property |
Lee DOT & City of Bonita Springs |
Coordinating with Bonita Springs |
|
|
60% Design Complete |
Lee DOT |
|
Completed |
|
All Permits Approved |
Lee DOT |
Revisions for SFWMD being completed |
|
|
100% Roadway Design |
Lee DOT |
Final review |
Complete 7/05 |
|
Bridge Plans |
Lee DOT |
90% complete |
|
|
Right of way maps |
Lee DOT |
|
Complete 6/05 |
|
Select Contractor |
Lee DOT |
Late 2005/early 2006 |
|
|
Begin Construction |
Lee DOT |
January 2006 |
|
|
Complete Construction |
Lee DOT |
June 2007 |
|
Monthly Progress: Progress has been made regarding the contract
necessary to acquire the Centex property, but the contract has not yet been
finalized. This is the largest and most complicated ROW acquisition needed
for this project.
Important Challenges: Obtain BOCC approval of the mitigation bank
to be used for this project. Staff has recommended the Corkscrew Mitigation
Bank but two other mitigation banks are competing for the business. The BOCC
needs to decide this issue at its August 2nd meeting. Water Management
District and Corps of Engineers permits cannot be obtained until this issue
is resolved. Thus delay in this decision will delay the bidding process and
the project.
|
Action |
Responsible Party |
Current Activity |
Completion/ Date |
|
100% Right of way plans |
Lee DOT |
Field surveys in process |
|
|
Complete Tisone/Centex Acquisition Contract |
Lee DOT |
Under negotiation |
|
|
Complete Other Property Acquisitions |
Lee DOT |
Many approved by the BOCC on 6-29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Permit Approval |
Lee DOT |
SFWMD’s only issue is the mitigation credit
issue |
|
|
Roadway Design Complete |
Lee DOT |
Final Report Under Review |
Complete |
|
Request for Bids |
Lee DOT |
Draft documents under review |
|
|
Open Bids |
Lee DOT |
|
|
|
Select Contractor |
Lee DOT |
|
|
|
Begin Construction |
Lee DOT |
January 2006 |
|
|
Complete Construction |
Lee DOT |
June 2007 |
|
Monthly Progress: Progress is being made in mitigation
negotiations with the Water District and the Corp of Engineers.
Important Challenges: Acquisition of three major parcels from two
owners that are necessary for detention ponds required by this project and
the Estero Parkway Flyover.
|
Action |
Responsible Party |
Current Activity |
Completion/ Date |
|
Property Acquisition |
Lee DOT |
|
|
|
Permit Approval |
Lee DOT |
SFWMD awaiting environmental supplement for
final approval |
|
|
Roadway Design |
Lee DOT |
Finalizing for 100% submittal |
August 2005 |
|
Request for Bids |
Lee DOT |
|
|
|
Open Bids |
Lee DOT |
|
|
|
Select Contractor |
Lee DOT |
|
|
|
Begin Construction |
Lee DOT |
October 2005 |
|
|
Complete Construction |
Lee DOT |
April 2007 |
|
Monthly Progress: Site preparation and clearing continues on the
Corkscrew to Williams Road segment since June. Storm sewer installation
continuing on the Coconut to Williams Road segment.
|
Action |
Responsible Party |
Planned Date |
Actual Date |
|
Start Construction Phase 1 – Coconut to
Williams Road |
Oakbrook Properties and the Simon Development
Group |
May 2005 |
May 2005 |
|
Start Construction Phase 2 – Corkscrew Road to
Williams Road |
Oakbrook Properties and the Simon Development
Group |
May 2005 |
June 2005 |
|
Start Construction – Coconut Road to Pelican
Colony Boulevard |
Oakbrook Properties and the Simon Development
Group |
July 2005 |
July 2005 |
|
Complete Construction Phase 1 – Coconut Road to
Williams Road |
Oakbrook Properties and the Simon Development
Group |
March 2006 |
|
|
Complete Construction Phase 2– Corkscrew Road
to Williams Road |
Oakbrook Properties and the Simon Development
Group |
August 2006 |
|
|
Complete Construction – Coconut Road to Pelican
Colony Boulevard |
Oakbrook Properties and the Simon Development
Group |
August 2006 |
|
Monthly Progress: Right of way acquisition now 85% complete.
Important Challenges: Mitigation negotiations with the Water
District and the Corps of Engineers must be completed before the project can
be permitted. All available road contactors have more work than they can
handle so competition for new projects is limited. In addition the County
will soon have 5 or 6 projects ready to bid. Not all of them can be bid at
the same time. Thus some will be delayed, and the costs are likely to be
higher, because the supply side of the market is so limited.
|
Action |
Responsible Party |
Current Activity |
Completion/ Date |
|
Air rights agreement |
Lee DOT |
Working on legal description |
|
|
Right of Way Acquisition |
Lee County |
September 2005 |
|
|
Permit Approval |
Lee County |
Coordination re mitigation |
|
|
90% Bridge Plans |
Lee County |
Underway |
|
|
90% Roadway Plans |
Lee County |
Completion expected in November 2005 |
|
|
Approved Construction Financing Available |
Lee County |
October 2005 |
|
|
Begin Construction |
Lee County |
May 2006 |
|
|
Complete Construction |
Lee County |
|
|
Each summer Lee County
Department of Community Development publishes a report assessing the “Level
of Service” for each road segment in the county, among other public assets.
In the report the county uses the most recent traffic counts to grade each
road segment’s ability to handle the current traffic. Roads that are
handling the traffic best are accorded a grade of “A” and those that are
failing will be assigned a grade of “F”.
When the developer of a commercial project seeks a Development Orders
(DO) for a project, the County uses the concurrency information and the
traffic impact statement for the project to decide if the DO can be approved
without causing the adjacent roads to fail. If an adjacent arterial roadway
is predicted to fail when the proposed project opens for business, the
County can deny the DO and the project cannot proceed until the road is
improved.
The recently released report contains information on two Estero road
segments that may delay major retail projects that will soon be seeking
Development Orders or rezoning. They are:
• The segment of Corkscrew Road between Three Oaks Parkway and I-75.
During both 2003 and 2004 this segment received a grade of “D”. Projects
under review on this segment include the
Embassy Suites,
Arizona Pizza,
Hampton Inn, a 40,000 square foot medical office building,
Classic Car Wash,
a 168,000 Lowe’s store, 25,000 square foot of small stores in the
Estero
Town Commons. In addition traffic on the road will be increased by the fall
2006 opening of the Coconut Point Town Center and several other commercial
developments west on Corkscrew Road and south on US 41.
• The segment of Coconut Road between Spring Creek Road and US 41. During
both 2003 and 2004 this segment received a grade of “D” although the volume
of traffic in 2004 was about 20% higher than in 2003. Traffic on this
segment is increasing due to continuing construction in the
Hyatt Time-share
development; the Colony in Pelican Landing and in Coconut Shores. Future
development of the former Weeks Fish Camp property and the JED development
on the 46 acre parcel on the northwest corner of Coconut and US 41 may be
delayed until this segment or the intersection is improved.
With the
construction of Gulf Coast Town Center at Alico and I-75 the developers are
widening Ben Hill Griffin from Alico to one mile south of that intersection.
This project is now underway and is expected to be completed in October. The
County’s 2020 long range transportation plan calls for Ben Hill Griffin to
be six-laned down to Estero Parkway. A substantial part of the impact fees
paid by the Gulf Coast Town Center are set aside for this widening project,
but traffic conditions do not warrant this expansion today.
The first phase of Gulf Coast Town Center is also scheduled to be
completed in October. The stores expected to open at that time are:
• Super Target
• Linens ‘n Things
• Petco
• Babies “R” Us
• Jo-ann Etc.
• Regal Cinema
The second phase, to be opened in the fall of 2006, will include:
• Bas Pro Shops
• Belk, and
• J C Penney.
Earlier this month Lee
Memorial Health Systems closed on the purchase of 22 acres in the section of
Coconut Point that lies south of Coconut Road. The property is located
adjacent to the Bonita Community Health Center.
The purchase agreement prohibits Lee Memorial from building more than
30,000 square feet of medical space and more than 100,000 square feet of
office or retail space prior to 2009. This restriction would not preclude
the development of a free-standing emergency department. Florida law
prohibits the development of such facilities until July 2006. If such a
facility is to be approved for the site Estero and Bonita residents will
need to work with the Lee Memorial to persuade the legislature to provide
the necessary legal authority. This facility would permit major emergencies
to be handled locally rather than requiring transport to the nearest
hospitals about 10 miles away. Alternatively Lee Memorial could use the land
and the existing building authority to expand the existing Community Health
Center.
Thus this site will not be home to a south Lee County hospital for at
least five years. If Lee Memorial wants to proceed with a hospital in 2009
they would need to seek an amendment of the existing Development of Regional
Impact (DRI) zoning. According to press reports Lee Memorial’s studies
suggest that by 2015 a 200 bed full service hospital may be needed in the
area.
Between February 16th and July 1st the Chief Lee County Hearing Examiner
heard six days of testimony regarding
Cingular Wireless PCS’s, formerly
AT&T, rezoning request that would permit a long established cellular site in
the middle of The Colony of Pelican Landing to be redeveloped with a stealth
tower and 15 single family homesites. During these Hearings the
Pelican
Landing Community Association (PLCA), WCI, The Colony Foundation and many
residents of Pelican Landing and The Colony consistently opposed the
proposed development unless it is developed consistent with the standards
used in the surrounding communities and supports the communities and their
associations in a manner comparable to the support that has been provided by
the residents of The Colony and
Pelican Landing.
These community leaders and residents will be happy to learn about the
following letter submitted to Diana Parker, Lee County’s Chief Hearing
Examiner, by Stacy C. Frank, attorney for Cingular:
“The letter is to inform you that New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC
(“Cingular”), the Colony at Pelican Landing, Inc., and WCI Communities, Inc.
are in the process of resolving their respective differences regarding
Cingular’s rezoning application. I have been authorized by each of the
parties to request that you issue a recommendation to the Board of County
Commissioners approving Cingular’s application subject to those conditions
attached as Exhibit “A”. In response to the concern expressed by Mr. Hart
during the July 1, 2005 hearing, Cingular has agreed to remove the tower no
later than December 31, 2006.
If your schedule allows, we are requesting that you expedite your ruling
to allow for an early September hearing before the County Commission…”
Exhibit “A”, entitled “Cingular Property Summary Sheet, contains the
following major provisions, among others:
“1. Maximum Building Height – 35 feet…
8. Minimum square feet of living area – 2,400 square feet air conditioned
9. Number of lots – 15…
11. Maintain all existing buffers on the property and provide new buffers as
indicated on the
master concept plan. The new buffers/streetscape should be consistent with
the existing neighborhoods and road way buffers. A berm and wall combination
may be used so long as the ultimate height meets the LDC requirements.
Buffers/streetscape should include five trees (14 foot in height, 3 ½ inch
caliper with 8 foot spread) planted per 100 linear feet and a continuous
double staggered hedge, measuring a minimum of 60 inches high (48 inches at
installation and maintained at 60 inches high) within one year after the
date of planting….
12. The Pelican Landing and The Colony at Pelican Landing Design/Build
Guidelines (as may be amended) regarding exterior materials and colors,
windows, doors, patios, screened porches, garages, driveways and walkways,
exterior lighting, water features, solar panels, accessory structures,
landscaping, grading and drainage, walls, fences, hedges and plantings,
streetscaping and landscape maintenance will be applicable….
2. Home sites will be designed to be consistent with a Mediterranean
theme,
3. Existing tower to be removed no later than December 31, 2006.”
On July 11th attorney Charles Basinet,
representing the owner of this business, presented a proposal to the ECPP to
rezone the old fire station site, north of Broadway on east side of US 41,
from public to commercial and combine it with the existing manufactured
homes sales area to the south. The Panel had strong reservations about the
seven deviations that were requested since they undercut the
Estero
Community Plan’s provisions on setbacks and landscaping. The Panel was
especially opposed to permitting these deviations to apply to uses other
than the existing manufactured homes sales use since the other uses should
not need deviations uniquely appropriate for mobile home sales. The ECPP and
the community questioned the continuing need for three entrances off of US
41. Basinet indicated they would explore how the deviations could be applied
only to the existing use; how one of the entrances could be eliminated; how
some of the requested uses could be eliminated and how more creative
landscaping and buffering could be implemented along US 41.
Also on July 11th at the ECPP meeting two planners
and two owners of this 10 acre US 41 lot between the entrances to
Fountain
Lakes and Marsh Landing presented plans for a 112,434 square foot
storage/office/retail facility. They indicated that the Halfway Creek
wetlands will remain as wetlands and that the two proposed buildings will be
on the Fountain Lakes/ northern end of the property.
The proposed three story self-storage building will not look like a self
storage facility, but more like an office building, similar to the high end
storage facilities the developers have built in Naples. The only deviation
being requested is for less parking than would normally apply to commercial
projects inasmuch as storage facilities do not generate much traffic and
require much parking.
The developers proposed a two story retail/office building at the rear of
the property. The Panel suggested that in the interest of the nearby
Fountain Lakes residents, it would be desirable to limit this building to
one story. The developers indicated that the uses of that building were
uncertain and they will come back when they have something more concrete.
The developers also indicated that they would be willing to eliminate the US
41 entrance to the property if they could be assured an entrance through the
Fountain Lakes entry road. The entire area will be included in a CPD, thus
providing some protection that the included preserve and southern upland
area would not be developed in the future. The developers hope to improve
drainage in Halfway Creek by removing the exotic plants and trees and by the
design of their drainage system.
South of Corkscrew on the East Side of Three
Oaks and an Unnamed RPD/CPD on the Southwest Corner of Corkscrew and Three
Oaks
Also on July 11th Banks Engineering presented a proposal for ASCOT
Development to rezone 47 acres on the southwest corner of Corkscrew and
Three Oaks for 376 residential units and 13.4 acres of neighborhood
commercial development. The ECPP pointed out that the proposed density would
far exceed Lee County’s limit for areas such as this of six units per acre.
The developers responded that the higher density is needed to support the
smaller, non-big-box, stores that are planned for the commercial area. The
Panel also questioned why the proposal provides only a 25 foot setback from
the Estero River instead of a 50 foot setback as has been proposed on some
other projects fronting the river. The developer’s engineer replied that the
project would meet the existing County standards for protecting the Estero
River and that the river is viewed as a big selling point for potential
purchasers of the residential units. Chairman Noethlich indicated that while
he is concerned about density he was inclined to be flexible if that was
what was needed to avoid having a big box constructed on the corner. The
residential was proposed as two and three story buildings.
The same developers proposed development of another 26 acres directly across
Three Oaks Parkway for 192 multi-family housing units also located along the
banks of the Estero River. Issues raised by the Panel and the community
included:
• Density,
• Building height,
• Appearance of the buildings backing up to Three Oaks Parkway,
• The need for appearance standards that apply to both projects,
• The rectangular shape of the large lake, and
• The setback from the river.
On July 13th the
developers of this project presented their proposal for a 3,680 square foot
sit down and carry out restaurant to the EDRC for the second time. The
proposed restaurant would be located just west of the Tires Choice facility
on the north side of Corkscrew just west of I-75. As its name implies
Arizona Pizza is a southwestern US firm. This restaurant would be their
first in the southeastern United States. The proposal includes an outdoor
dining area and shared parking with the adjacent Tires Choice store.
At the July 13th meeting the applicant addressed comments received during
their June presentation. The applicant amended their plans in the following
ways:
• Added a tiled pitched roof,
• The north elevation was changed to correspond to the front façade,
• Added stamped, asphalt pavement in the turn-around area and rounded the
corners in this area,
• Added more Mediterranean details to the architecture, removed the glass
block from the chimney and added some stone next to the entrance,
• Added scrub dwarf palmettos to the top of the banks of the detention area,
• Added more plantings along the lot lines and along Corkscrew Road;
however, the lot lines still need more plantings to satisfy the type A
buffer requirements.
During the review the EDRC made the following additional suggestions:
• Applicant stated they had revised the landscape plans to include
plantings that are at least 45 gallon size, 14 foot high, 3 inch caliper
and 5-6 foot spread trees; however, this was not included in the
specifications presented to the committee. Only the 9 parking lot trees
complied. Applicant agreed to change all trees to meet these
specifications,
• The Committee felt that the diagrammatic plan that was presented does
not meet County code or the Corkscrew Overlay intentions. The landscape
plan must show where the individual plants will be planted. Applicant
agreed to revise the plan.
• The project design does not meet the 75% native plant County
landscape requirement,
• The dumpster enclosure must be enclosed with plantings per a pending
LDC change,
• The Committee asked for more information on the roof materials such as
the name and whether it is a standing seam metal roof,
• The plan included an asbestos chimney that would be used for the wood
oven. Committee recommends that this chimney be enclosed.
• The Committee questioned the combination of a railing and an abutting
wall on the south elevation. The railing is in front of the outdoor
dining. The committee felt the Applicant should use one or the other –
railing or wall. The developer stated that he used a railing as he
needed a gate for fire emergency purposes, but agreed to research the
issue further.
• The applicant indicated that he planned to mount rain curtains around
the outdoor dining area. The Committee urged that these curtains not be
the plastic type that blows in the rain/wind. Applicant stated he was
also investigating a roll-down type which fits into a track. The
Committee liked that idea better.
Finally, the developer agreed to take the following actions:
• Change all trees to the recommended specifications,
• Develop a plan that will show where the individual plants will be
planted,
• Enclose the dumpster with plantings,
• Change the awning over the coolers to a metal pan roof. The applicant
agreed to return to the EDRC for a third time in order to resolve these
issues.