|
Estero Development Report
Volume 11, Number 8, Issued April 2012
Produced by the Estero Council of Community Leaders (ECCL)
May Opportunities for Citizen Participation That will Protect Estero's
Quality of Life
|
Date
|
Time
|
Event
|
Location
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tuesday, May 1st
|
9 a.m.
|
Board of County Commissioners Meeting…Conservation
20/20 Program Continuance
|
Commission Chambers, 2nd Floor, Old County
Courthouse, 2120 Main Street in downtown Ft. Myers
|
|
Tuesday, May 8th
|
5:00 p.m.
|
Estero Fire Rescue Monthly Board Meeting
|
District Headquarters on Three Oaks just south of Corkscrew
|
|
Wednesday, May 9th
|
5 p.m.
|
Estero Design Review Committee (EDRC) meeting
|
Estero Community Park
|
|
Friday, May 11th
|
10 a.m.
|
ECCL Regular Monthly Meeting…Darla Letourneau,
BikeWalkLee will be our speaker
|
Estero Community Park
|
|
Friday, May 11th
|
1:30 p.m.
|
Lee County MPO (Transportation Planning) meeting
|
Cape Coral City Council Chambers, 1015 Cultural Park Blvd, Cape
Coral
|
|
Monday, May 21st
|
6 p.m.
|
Estero Community Planning Panel (ECPP) Meeting
|
Estero Community Park
|
Index
Estero Community Website (www.esterofl.org)
The community groups sponsoring the site are:
Estero Community Planning
Panel (ECPP)
Estero Design Review
Committee (EDRC)
Estero Council of Community
Leaders (ECCL)
Estero Community
Association (ECA)
Corkscrew Woods Seeks Comprehensive Plan Amendment
On
April 23, the Lee County Local Planning Agency (LPA) voted to recommend
that the Board of County Commissioners approve a Comprehensive Plan
amendment for the Cameratta Properties, Inc.’s proposed
Corkscrew Woods
development.
Corkscrew Woods is located in the DR/GR, just east of the
Bella Terra
community on the south side of East Corkscrew Road.
As a former mining site, this property for many years has had
a vested right to develop 254 residential units. Cameratta Properties wants to increase the number of units up to
800 single family homes, an increase of about 550 units.
After
the Estero Community and The Conservancy of Southwest Florida raised
concerns about removing the property from the DR/GR,
Representatives of Cameratta Properties worked with Lee County
staff to draft a proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment to establish an
“improved residential communities’ overlay” within the DR/GR that apply
to Corkscrew Woods and would create a system for Cameratta to pay for
the additional density.
This would employ a proposed new TDR (transfer of development
rights) program that would apply to the property while ensuring that the
rezoning of the property includes several important environmental
improvements the developer has agreed to implement.
Under
the staff proposal approved by the LPA Cameratta Properties would agree
to pay $8,500 per unit for some of the additional units approved for the
site. If this TDR option applies to 150 units the developer would pay
the County approximately $1.2 million. According to the approved
proposal these funds could be used as seed money for starting the DR/GR
TDR program or building a panther underpass on Corkscrew Road.
Corkscrew Woods would be the first proposed Comp Plan amendment since
the new DR/GR Comp Plan become law, after an extensive state review
after it was challenged by several Corkscrew Road landowners who would
like to mine their property.
The
basic idea behind this program is that a development within the DR/GR
that seeks to increase its density must do so by purchasing development
rights from other DR/GR lands that are needed for the restoration of the
flowways. For example, a
farmer in the DR/BR who is farming 4,000 acres could sell the
residential development rights on that land (presently authorized at 1
unit per 10 acres except for wetlands that are authorized at 1 unit per
20 acres), or about 400 units and continue to farm that land.
This
proposed Comp Plan amendment will go before the Board of County
Commissioners sometime this summer or fall.
County Prepares for Trial over Midtowne Estero
Zoning
On
April 10, the Lee Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) voted to allocate
funds to hire expert witnesses in order to prepare for an upcoming trial
with Estero Place LLC, the would-be developers of
Midtowne Estero. The Midtowne Estero development is located on the southwest corner of Three
Oaks and Corkscrew Road.
The
owners of Midtowne Estero are claiming a temporary taking of their
property rights when their zoning application was denied in 2008 and
later approved in January 2010.
They claim their property was in an economically frozen state,
unable to be developed, sold or refinanced.
A
recently completed court-ordered mediation resulted in Estero Place LLC
requesting a settlement of $2.25 million. The commission declined this
proposal.
Back
in 2008, Estero Place LLC applied to rezone their property to include a
140,000 square foot big box store on their site.
Members of the Estero Council of Community Leaders, Estero
Planning Panel, the Brooks Concerned Citizens, Estero Fire and Rescue,
and many others spoke in opposition to changing the zoning to allow for
a big box store at that location.
The BOCC voted unanimously to deny this application after hearing
community concerns about traffic circulation around this intersection.
In
January 2010, the BOCC reviewed the zoning for this property for a
fourth time and voted to limit the maximum size of any commercial
building in the development to 100,000 square feet.
April Transportation Committee Report
Road
Watch Advisory
The
Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT)
issued a Road Watch
Advisory on April 29 regarding the 6-laning of US 41 from Corkscrew Road
to San Carlos Boulevard.
The
two northbound lanes, from County Road to San Carlos Boulevard, will
shift to the recently constructed lanes on the east side of US 41.
County Road is next to the Estero Fire Rescue Station located
between Corkscrew Road and Broadway
The
southbound traffic will continue to use the two lanes currently in use.
While the median is under construction, drivers can make U-turns
and left turns only at Corkscrew Road, County Road, Broadway Avenue,
Vintage Parkway/Breckenridge Drive, Hickory Drive and San Carlos
Boulevard.
Crews
are constructing lanes in the median in preparation for the fall 2012
traffic shift. At that
time, the two southbound travel lanes will use the new lanes in the
median while crews construct the new southbound lanes on the west side
of US 41.
Broadway Avenue East is expected to open to traffic by May 5.
US
41/Sweetwater Ranch Full Signalization
A
“roundtable” meeting is scheduled on Friday, June 25, with the Florida
Department of Transportation (FDOT) to discuss a fully operational
traffic light at US 41 and Sweetwater Ranch.
While a time has not yet been set, the meeting will be held at
the Estero Fire Rescue Administrative offices.
State
Senator Benacquisto, FDOT personnel, the Estero Fire Chief, ECCL
Transportation Committee members and one representative from each of the
affected communities will take part in this discussion.
The meeting will also be open to the public.
Continuation of Conservation 20/20 Program
Returns to BOCC Agenda on May 1st
On
April 17, members of the Estero Council of Community Leaders, Brooks
Concerned Citizens, Conservancy of Southwest Florida and a number of
others went before the Lee Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) to speak
in favor of retaining the Conservation 20/20 Program.
The
Program, which is overseen by the Lee County Division of County Lands
and Lee County Department of Parks & Recreation, has been under fire
recently. The County Clerk
of Courts Office has stated that the county has paid too much for some
of their land acquisitions, suggested that some of the Conservation
20/20 monies be used for other purposes and that the Program should be
put up for a referendum to determine if the voters still want the
program.
The
BOCC heard from more than 40 members of the public, and then Karen
Maguire, Division of County Lands, responded to the Internal Auditor’s
(IA) recommendations. One of
the IA’s recommendations suggested appraising properties as only vacant
land with no consideration of its future development potential.
Staff did not agree with this recommendation as it would put a
cap on all properties at a zoning of AG-2 and rural land use. Maguire
pointed out that this would lead to a loss of “willing sellers” and the
County would lose its ability to acquire environmentally sensitive
lands. The Conservation 20/20 program has always dealt with landowners
who volunteer their property for possible acquisition.
Maguire also pointed out that the current acquisition staff consists of
2 FTE (Full Time Equivalent) licensed appraisers, 2 FTE licensed
brokers, 5 FTE license salespersons and 6 FTE are certified by the
International Right of Way Association, the recognized professional
association for those involved with governmental real estate.
Certification requires at least 5 years of experience in this
specialized field with over 240 hours of course work with examinations
and continuing education updates.
Each employee averages 18 years of experience in governmental
real estate.
The
meeting lasted nearly four hours.
The commission instructed the staff to add to the agenda for
Tuesday, May 1, another discussion of the Program, including some of the
recommendations made during public comment.
The
Estero Council of Community Leaders joined the Conservancy of Southwest
Florida, a number of environmental groups and other Estero community
representatives signing a letter to the BOCC in support of the
Conservation 20/20 program along with some suggestions for enhancing the
program in the future.
The
20/20 Program was initiated in 1996 when a majority of voters in Lee
County voted to increase property taxes by up to 0.5 mils to fund the
purchase of environmentally sensitive lands.
Since that time, over 24,469 acres of lands have been purchased,
including a portion of the CREW Lands and the Six Mile Cypress Slough
Preserve. Conservation 20/20
has ranked Edison Farms as one of its most desirable potential
purchases.
BOCC Debates Impact Fees
On Tuesday April 10 the Board of County Commissioners took up the issue
of adjusting the county’s impact fee schedule. The Board of County
Commissioners (BOCC) has the authority to adopt impact fees for a wide
variety of capital purposes.
The Lee plan requires impact fee be reviewed regularly and updated as
necessary. The Board
approved a contract last year with Duncan and Associates, Inc. to review
and update the existing Impact Fee Schedule.
This year the consultants (Ducan Associates) recommended that the
majority of impact fees be reduced and the county staff thus recommended
those reductions to the Board of County Commissioners.
However this year a major effort was made by the building and business
community to gain BOCC approval for establishing a two year suspension
of all impact fees. The building industry claimed that this two year
suspension would be a great help to the industry and would create many
jobs.
The opponents to the suspension (including the ECCL) claimed that there
was no evidence that suspending the impact fees would stimulate new
residential or commercial building. During the recession the County’s
impact fee revenue has fallen precipitously thus sharply curtailing
County infrastructure spending. Although a moratorium is not likely to
induce more building it would add to the County’s fiscal problems.
In addition the opponents claimed that it would create an unfair
competitive advantage for new business and home owners compared to
existing business and home owners who had to pay the impact fees.
At the BOCC meeting there were many people from the building and real
estate industry and a number of people who spoke against the two years
suspension, including four from the ECCL.
After a great number of speakers the Board of County Commissioner voted
unanimously to:
There was no vote on the
suspension ---It appeared that there was very little support for this
proposal from the commissioners.
DR/GR Comp Plan and Mining Litigation Update
Ralf
Brookes, the attorney who has been representing the ECCL, The Brooks
Concerned Citizens (BCC), the Conservancy and the Corkscrew Rural
residents, reported to the
members of the ECCL at their April 11th ECCL meeting.
DR/GR
Comp Plan Legal Challenge
The
Florida Department of Economic Opportunity recently agreed with an
Administrative Law Judge’s decision that Lee County’s Comprehensive Plan
meets the state’s standards of protecting our water resources in the
DR/GR by confining all mining to the Alico Road corridor. With this
decision all of the provisions of the DR/GR Plan become law.
As a
result of this decision the pending Corkscrew Road mine applications,
primarily for the 5,000 acre FFD application and the 6,000 acre Old
Corkscrew Plantation application have been placed in reserve until all
of the limerock in the Future Limerock Mine Overlay along Alico Road has
been produced or the Overlay has been amended.
Brookes stated that the administrative law judge, in making his
decision, had noted that:
- Mines
adversely affect wildlife because they replace wetlands with open mine
pits. A panther must go
around a pit; it cannot go through it.
Also, there are no living plants near mine pits, which are vital
to wildlife.
Lost
Grove Mine
Regarding the Lost Grove Mine, Brookes pointed out that people planning
on testifying before the Collier County Board of Commissioners should
talk about how the mine would personally affect them and/or their
neighborhoods. They should
also refer to the USGA study which forcast how much rock will be needed
in the future and that lime rock use has declined due to the economy.
There is no date set for this hearing.
Mines
affect neighbors due to the blasting and heavy truck traffic, as well as
replacing natural landscapes with industrial landscapes.
Brookes pointed out that berms around a mine are a benefit to the miners
as the berms allow them to operate behind closed doors.
There is too little oversight once a mine has been approved, as
there are only a handful of inspectors available.
Proposal to Change the Lee Board of County Commissioners
A
petition is currently being circulated for a proposed Lee County charter
amendment to be placed on the ballot this November.
The petition is requesting a change in the composition of the
Board of County Commissioners (BOCC).
The Brooks Concerned Citizens believe that this proposed change
is not needed and if passed will reduce Estero’s access to and influence
on the Lee County Commissioners.
With
the current makeup of the BOCC, all Lee County voters cast ballots for
all five of the commissioners. While each Commissioner must reside in
one of the five geographic district issues, they are responsible to all
Lee County voters and are thereby held accountable for decisions
affecting all of Lee County.
All Commissioners run at large and are politically responsible to
all Lee County residents and voters.
Currently we have access to each commissioner and they recognize the
importance of Estero because of our high level of voter participation
and solid support for candidates that support Estero’s needs.
The
petitioners are proposing an increase in the size of the BOCC from five
to seven members. Und eth proposal five commissioners would be elected
by district and therefore be politically accountable only to the
residents of their district.
The
remaining two commissioners would be elected at large by all of the
voters in Lee County. This
means that if the proposed charter amendment passes we would vote for
only three commissioners rather that all five as we do currently.
This amendment, if passed, would also add an estimated $500,000
to the Lee County budget in order to pay for the salary and benefits of
two additional commissioners, their offices and staff.
ECCL’s leadership believes this proposal would not benefit the
Estero community today.
Lee County Commissioners Consider
Bonita Springs Ambulance Proposal Again
As previously reported, on October 25, 2011, the
Lee County Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) heard from proponents
and opponents of the Bonita Springs Fire and Rescue Service (BSFD)
proposal to assume responsibility from Lee County
Emergency Medical Services
(EMS) for patient emergency ambulance transportation from Bonita Springs
to area hospitals. Lee County EMS is opposed this proposal.
Originally, the parties agreed to jointly retain a hearing
examiner and a forensic auditor to evaluate the divergent positions and
cost estimates. In
subsequent meetings, that approach was abandoned.
On April 10, the BOCC reconsidered this issue and
voted 3-2 against granting the BSFD request to transport.
However, the law now requires another public hearing.
The public will have another opportunity to appear before the
BOCC on May 22 at which time a final resolution is expected.
The
ECCL has not taken a position on this matter at this time because we
believe that the proposal if implemented would not significantly affect
Estero residents, and we believe that both positions have merit.
Continued Progress at
Bonita Springs Estero Economic Development Council
The Bonita Springs Estero
Economic Development Council (“Council”) recently celebrated its first
year in operation by holding its first Annual Meeting of investors.
The meeting was held at Shaw Development…a local manufacturer
that has been successful at expanding its business into foreign markets.
Attendees participated in a tour of Shaw’s factory operation.
Council Chair Rich Mancini
and Executive Director Christine Ross outlined the Council’s activities
and accomplishments in its first year.
Attendance included Ben Nelson, Bonita Springs’ mayor, Lee County
Commissioner Ray Judah, and other supporters from the City and Lee
County’s Economic Development Department.
Investors were well represented, including the ECCL.
A number of potential investors also participated in the meeting
which allowed them to better understand the Council’s mission and its
successes over the past year.
The successes include
creation of the web site,
www.BonitaEDC.com,
which includes a wealth of
information on the local area.
And the Council is now regularly receiving calls and following up
on leads from interested businesses considering relocation.
In addition, a close working relationship has been achieved with
the Director of Development Services in Bonita Springs.
This has helped to streamline the permitting process with the
City, Bonita Springs Fire and Rescue, and Bonita Springs Utilities,
thereby facilitating business growth.
On April 4, the Bonita
Springs City Council approved additional Council funding of $10,500,
which matched new investments from local businesses. New investors
include Estero businesses: the
Bonita Community Health Center and Ted Todd Insurance.
On April 24, the Council
issued a press release urging voters to speak before the Lee County
Board of Commissioners on May 22.
At that time, the Commissioners will decide whether to call for a
special referendum election in November to allow Lee County voters to
vote whether to allow slot machines at the Naples-Fort Myers Greyhound
Track. The release points
out that should the voters approve the slots, “the owners of the dog
track have indicated they will invest $80 - $100 million in improving
the current facility.” This
would mean hundreds of construction and long term jobs and would benefit
the local economy year-round.
Over the next several
months, Council representatives will be interviewing a number of local
businesses to see what can be done to assist the businesses to grow and
make Bonita/Estero even more business-friendly.
Estero’s March Housing Permits Slow but Quarterly
Permits
Highest in Last Five Years
During March, fourteen
single family homes with a building value of
$1.4 million were permitted in Estero.
This number is less than each of the first two months of the year
and about the same as March a year ago.
But, on the strength of higher permits in January and February
this year, the quarterly figures, shown in the table below, are about
70% ahead of last year’s first quarter.
All of the March permits were issued to Lennar’s
Bella Terra on Corkscrew Rd.
The following table compares March year-to-date
figures with those of the prior twelve years:
|
Year
|
Annual Total Housing Units
|
Building Value of Units
|
Average Building Value Per Unit
|
Percentage of Single Family Units
|
|
2000
|
506
|
$68,142,696
|
$134,669
|
41%
|
|
2001
|
584
|
88,114,145
|
150,880
|
42
|
|
2002
|
292
|
55,956,255
|
191,631
|
60
|
|
2003
|
532
|
77,905,904
|
146,440
|
32
|
|
2004
|
371
|
74,011,015
|
199,491
|
73
|
|
2005
|
883
|
168,168,623
|
190,451
|
37
|
|
2006
|
569
|
119,676,682
|
210,328
|
15
|
|
2007
|
218
|
56,648,641
|
259,856
|
33
|
|
2008
|
40
|
13,791,205
|
344,780
|
90
|
|
2009
|
36
|
14,016,521
|
389,348
|
78
|
|
2010
|
58
|
11,319,925
|
195,171
|
79
|
|
2011
|
36
|
5,837,350
|
162,149
|
78
|
|
2012
|
62
|
9,689,103
|
156,276
|
84
|
Estero’s March Commercial Permits Includes
A Large Investment by Goodwill Industries
During March, permits totaling $ 1.3 million were
issued for Estero’s
commercial buildings. This includes a $ 1.0 million investment by
Goodwill Industries in the Corkscrew
Commons development on the north side of Corkscrew just west of I-75.
The year-to-date total, shown in the table below, slightly
exceeds the first quarter of 2011 despite a $ 2.1 million investment for
Cayo de Estero in January, 2011.
As shown in the following table, Estero’s
commercial development peaked in 2006 with a total of $185 million.
Since then, total commercial investment in Estero has fallen
precipitously and has remained especially low for the last five years.
|
Year
|
Year to Date
|
Annual Total
|
|
2000
|
$6,493,092
|
$77,250,835
|
|
2001
|
12,714,570
|
44,116,526
|
|
2002
|
2,377,297
|
23,135,139
|
|
2003
|
3,348,635
|
23,234,725
|
|
2004
|
2,556,018
|
60,859,820
|
|
2005
|
7,209,706
|
111,037,977
|
|
2006
|
68,428,727
|
184,709,240
|
|
2007
|
49,358,941
|
157,614,045
|
|
2008
|
18,837,360
|
39,261,677
|
|
2009
|
4,575,618
|
9,752,556
|
|
2010
|
411,276
|
9,322,546
|
|
2011
|
3,877,089
|
11,717,593
|
|
2012
|
3,982,640
|
?
|
There have been two major projects permitted so far in 2012: $1.0
million for some remodeling within Coconut Point and the $1.0 million
for Goodwill Industries.
Note: The building values above understate the cost of each residence or
commercial building because they exclude the value of the underlying
land.
The County permit information used in this report may be found at
http://www.lee-county.com/dcd/Reports/EsteroReports.htm
April Estero Single Family Home Sales Decline;
Year to Date Sales Off 11%
Multiple Listing Service (MLS) figures indicate that twenty-nine single
family homes in Estero were sold in April.
As shown below, this represents a 42 % decrease from a year ago.
For the year-to-date, sales are down 11 %.
After January’s strong start, the last three months have shown
negative comparisons with the equivalent months in 2011.
Over the next month, the ECCL will be working with Joe Pavich,
Sr. to better understand this trend.
|
Period
|
Sold in 2011
|
Sold in 2012
|
Inc (Dec)
|
Inc (Dec) %
|
|
Jan
|
23
|
58
|
35
|
152%
|
|
Feb
|
45
|
21
|
(24)
|
-53
|
|
Mar
|
39
|
32
|
(7)
|
-18
|
|
Qtr 1
|
107
|
111
|
4
|
4
|
|
Apr
|
50
|
29
|
(21)
|
-42
|
|
YTD
|
157
|
140
|
(17)
|
-11
|
|
May
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
June
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
Qtr 2
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
YTD
|
212
|
|
|
|
|
July
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
Aug
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
Sept
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
Qtr 3
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
YTD
|
293
|
|
|
|
|
Oct
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
Nov
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
Dec
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
Qtr 4
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
354
|
|
|
|
As of
April 30, 2012, there were 384 listings of currently active unsold homes
in Estero. This is 10 % more
than at the beginning of the year, but is down 38 units (9%) since the
end of March. This month’s
decline is attributable to some snow birds that take their units off the
market when they leave to go north.
Of
the 384 active listings, about 18% represent “distressed sales,” i.e.,
short-sale listings or bank owned properties which, in each case, the
bank is expected to receive less than its loan amount.
This percent is unchanged from the end of last month.
Based
on sales in the recent past, the 384 active listings represent an eleven
month supply of unsold homes, down from a twelve month supply at
December 31, 2011. A six
month supply typically indicates a good market.
Comparable figures are not available as of last April.
Thanks again to Joe Pavich, Sr. of Realty World in Estero for compiling
these figures for the ECCL.
Note:
These amounts include most of Estero, but do not include the Estero
portion of Pelican Landing, which is not separately listed in the MLS.
Also, none of the above amounts include listings of multi-family
homes.
|