Estero Development Report
Volume 11, Number 10, Issued June 2012
Produced by the Estero Council of Community Leaders (ECCL) July & August Opportunities
for Citizen Participation That will Protect Estero's Quality of Life
|
Date
|
Time
|
Event
|
Location
|
|
Tuesday, July 10th |
5:00 p.m. |
Estero Fire Rescue Monthly Board Meeting |
District Headquarters on Three Oaks just south of Corkscrew |
|
Wednesday, July 11th |
9 a.m. |
Estero Fire Rescue Budget Presentation open to the
public |
District Headquarters on Three Oaks just south of Corkscrew |
|
Wednesday, July 11th |
5 p.m. |
Estero Design Review Committee (EDRC) meeting |
Estero Community Park |
|
Monday, July 16th
|
6 p.m. |
Estero Community Planning Panel (ECPP) Meeting |
Estero Community Park |
|
Friday, July 20th |
9 a.m. |
Lee County MPO (Transportation Planning) meeting |
Cape Coral City Council Chambers, 1015 Cultural Park Blvd, Cape
Coral |
|
Wednesday, August 8th |
5 p.m. |
Estero Design Review Committee (EDRC) meeting |
Estero Community Park |
|
Friday, August 10th |
10 a.m. |
ECCL Regular Monthly Meeting… will be our speaker |
Estero Community Park |
|
Tuesday, August 14th |
5:00 p.m. |
Estero Fire Rescue Monthly Board Meeting |
District Headquarters on Three Oaks just south of Corkscrew |
|
Friday, August 17th |
9 a.m. |
Lee County MPO (Transportation Planning) meeting |
Cape Coral City Council Chambers, 1015 Cultural Park Blvd, Cape
Coral |
|
Monday, August 20th |
6 p.m. |
Estero Community Planning Panel (ECPP) Meeting |
Estero Community Park |
Index
The community groups sponsoring the site are:
Estero Community Planning
Panel (ECPP)
Estero Design Review
Committee (EDRC)
Estero Council of Community
Leaders (ECCL)
Estero Community
Association (ECA)
BOCC Appoints a Blue Ribbon Committee
To Review the Conservation 20/20 Program
On
June 25, the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) voted for their
nominees to the newly formed “Blue Ribbon Committee” to evaluate the
Conservation 20/20 Program. The
BOCC agreed that the committee would consist of a total of seven
members, one person selected by each commissioner, and two people
selected from the County’s Conservation Lands Acquisition and
Stewardship Advisory Committee, called the CLASAC Committee. CLASAC is a citizen’s advisory committee which was formed 15 years ago
to oversee the selection of Conservation 20/20 eligible projects. The
Blue Ribbon Committee will hold its first meeting on August 1 and is
being directed to complete its recommendations within 90 days.
The
Commissioners decided to wait until the Blue Ribbon Committee completes
its task before considering whether or not the Conservation 20/20
program should be subject to a referendum as to whether or not it should
be extended or terminated.
The
ECCL, the Conservancy of Southwest Florida and several other groups have
indicated that, should the program go to a referendum, it should do so
at the next presidential election in the fall of 2016 when there will be
a large voter turnout. This
also would allow time for further negotiations for the acquisition of
the environmentally sensitive, 4,000 acre Edison Farms property just
east of The Brooks that is now in a foreclosure court. In
addition the Commissioners agreed to direct staff to continue
negotiating with all the approved properties and bringing forth
additional properties reviewed and recommended for purchase to the BOCC.
There is currently over $45 million on hand in the Conservation
20/20 fund and staff indicated these funds are sufficient to acquire all
remaining properties on both the approved project lists. The
Conservation 20/20 Program has been under fire by Charlie Green, the
County Clerk of Courts. He
has accused the County of overpaying for some of the properties that
have been acquired. He’s
stated that all properties should be valued at a rural/agricultural
designation, without consideration of any development rights they have
acquired through the zoning process.
US 41/Sweetwater Ranch Intersection Safety
Discussed with State LeadersA
ECCL Transportation Subcommittee meeting was held
on Monday, June 25, 2012 to discuss traffic local safety concerns with
the leadership of the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). The
meeting was set up as a "roundtable" for various officials to listen to
and discuss our request for a full working traffic signal at Sweetwater
Ranch Boulevard and State Route 41 that serves the
Fountain Lakes and
Rapallo Communities.
This is the location where, on February 1,
2012, seventeen year old Danielle Chapman was struck by a vehicle and
killed while attempting to cross US 41 to her home in Fountain Lakes. There already is a flashing yellow emergency signal
at this location to enable Estero Fire Rescue emergency vehicles to
safely exit their Station 42 on the East side of 41 to respond to
emergency calls. The State representatives who traveled to the
meeting included FDOT Secretary Ananth Prasad, Billy Hattaway FDOT
District 1 Secretary and State Senator Lizbeth Benacquisto who was
responsible for the FDOT executives being in attendance. Also at the
table was Ned Dewhurst, Vice-President of Oakbrook Properties, who
worked with Chairman Schweers to have the exiting signal installed a few
years earlier. Finally the group included Dave Loveland, Director of the
Lee County Department of Transportation, and Bill Williams and Jim
Boesch, Co-Chairs for the ECCL Transportation Committee. Schweers, a
member of that Committee Chaired this session. The Community representatives at the table sought
to have the FDOT Officials approve a full working traffic signal at this
location. FDOT officials stated that signals often lead to
more crashes and the State is committed to national guidelines regarding
signal spacing and traffic count criteria so that they can objectively
determine if a signal is needed at a given location. Secretary Prasad
stated that this intersection does not warrant a full working signal at
this time. Several Estero residents spoke up explaining the
many dangers that this intersection presents and Secretary Prasad stated
that he would like to grant our request but would need more information.
He stated that he hopes that a compromise can be reached. FDOT agreed to
further study traffic at the intersection and the surrounding area and
report back to the community in 90 days. The Transportation Committee members agreed to
continue working with State officials toward this goal. Lastly, the
communities made a request to have FDOT prohibit U turns at this
intersection for north bound traffic on US41 and the Secretary was more
receptive to this request. The State also announced that streetlights
will soon me installed on this segment of US 41 at a cost of $1.2
million. The ECCL Transportation committee will treat this
project as an on-going project for some time.
Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) Program Development
for the Density Reduction/Groundwater Resource (DR/GR) Area
On March 30th
the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity agreed with an
Administrative Law Judge’s decision that Lee County’s Comprehensive Plan
amendment for the DR/GR meets the state’s standards for protecting our
water resources. The deadline for appealing this decision by the parties
contesting the plan has expired without them filing an appeal. Thus all
of the provisions of the DR/GR Plan are now law. This
decision permits the County to begin to implement the provisions of the
plan that would restore the flowways and wetlands in that part of the
DR/GR that is not in the Future Limerock Mining Overlay. This area lies
along both sides of Corkscrew Road from
Bella Terra to the Collier
County line. The
development of an effective Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) program
is the key to the success of this program. A TDR program for the DR/GR
area will provide a mechanism for the owners of large DR/GR lands to
sell their development rights (primarily residential) to developers in
county designated areas outside the DR/GR and in a few peripheral areas
of the DR/GR that wish to increase the density of their developments.
The owners of these TDR sending lands will still be able to use the land
for agricultural purposes. On
June 15th the ECCL unanimously approved a resolution urging
the County to quickly move ahead with the development of a TDR program
for the DR/GR. That resolution noted the following provisions of the
DR/GR Comprehensive Plan directing such an effort: “Policy 33.3.5 of the recently enacted DR/GR Amendment to the
Comprehensive Plan states that “The Land Development Code will be
amended within one year to specify procedures for concentrating existing
development rights on large tracts, for transferring development rights
between landowners, for seeking approval of additional acreage
subdivisions, and for incorporating commercial and civic uses into
Mixed-Use Communities as designated on Map 17.” In
addition Policy 33.3.6 of the Lee Plan states “By 2012 Lee County will
evaluate the establishment and funding of a DR/GR TDR Bank that will
offer to purchase development rights for resale in the TDR system. The
purpose of this program is to give potential sellers the opportunity to
sell rights even if no developer is ready to use them and to give
potential development applicants the opportunity to obtain the necessary
rights without seeking them on the open market.” On
June 21st the Watershed Council of Southwest Florida schedule
a talk by Paul O’Connor, Lee County’s Director of Planning, on the
County’s plans for updating the existing ineffective TDR program. After
his presentation there was a lot of good discussion about TDR programs,
where Lee County has gaps in the concept and how it can be fixed. The
group suggested that there is an opportunity for the County to work with
the City of Bonita on a TDR concept where density from the Lee DR/GR
could be transferred to the areas of the Bonita DR/GR that have been
highly impacted by mining and development. The group also
encouraged the County to work on fixing the TDR program for the DR/GR. O’Connor pointed out that there
was a TDR program set up and in place within the DR/GR, but did
admit that it might need to be tweaked. He said he would prefer to
wait until there is a landowner interested in selling TDRs before
working on that. The audience gave some very strong feedback that
the changes should be done now, so that when a landowner comes forward
to participate, the program is fully functional. The
Council also stated that they did not want any future DR/GR landowners
to use the excuse that they cannot be expected to participate in the TDR
program because it is not viable and functional and therefore they
should be allow to exit the DR/GR. O’Connor understood this
position because it has happened so often in the past. O’Connor indicated that the County planning staff did not have the time
or the expertise to develop a TDR program at this time and that the
County would need to outsource this project to some TDR expert
consultants. He said he has a list of 11 approved consultants he
might be used for this project. O’Connor further indicated that he did
not know exactly how much this would cost and there are presently no
funds available for the project. It would be up to the advocates to
lobby to get the funding in the budget for such work. First Homes Being Built and Lots for Sale
at “The Preserve of Corkscrew”
Four
homes are under construction at Estero’s newest gated community, “The
Preserve at Corkscrew” (http://preserveatcorkscrew.com/).
The models are being built by Pulte (Pulte
Homes)
and Lennar (Lennar
Homes)
and are expected to be open to the general public in July.
Currently, lots are being offered for sale. The development is
located 2 miles east of I-75 on Corkscrew Rd., just west of Bella Terra.
As reported in the
September, 2011 EDR, the development is planned to include 441 single
family homes. It has been
designed as a quaint residential neighborhood consisting of a variety of
single-family homes, including estates. The amenity package is expected
to include a resort-style swimming pool, fitness center with
state-of-the-art equipment, gathering room, aerobics, library,
conference room, tennis courts, and pool cabana with a fireplace. Bonita Springs Estero Economic Development Council
Reports on 2012 Accomplishments
The
Bonita Springs Estero Economic Development Council (EDC), of which the
ECCL is an investor, continues its year-long activities to stimulate
business development in the area.
The EDC’s progress was discussed as part of a June 17 “economic
workshop” for members of Bonita Springs City Council. Christine Ross,
the EDC’s Executive Director, reported on the EDC’s 2012
accomplishments, including the following:
•
“Developed a process for
surveying CEO’s in conjunction with FGCU Economic Research Institute.
Goal to take a snap shot of
existing businesses to
assess their needs, potential for growth and to develop leads.
•
Continued to develop
partnerships with local, regional and state organizations to
support regional diversification and expansion of the economic base.
•
Building leads
for target industries: Bio and Life Sciences, Internet Technology &
Related Services, Aviation, Corporate Headquarters, Back Office & Shared
Services and Clean Manufacturing & Green Technologies.
•
Facilitating business mentoring
services with SBDC to facilitate growth and success of local start up
and existing businesses.
- Pushed at the county and state level for
targeted workforce
development through local schools and universities to address
the needs of existing and emerging companies.
•
Established a “Red Carpet
Committee” of EDC members to meet with developers and business
leads.
•
Monitoring occupational license and occupancy permits
to gauge the speed of our recovery.
•
Continue to promote the Bonita Springs/Estero marketplace
as the most business friendly community in the region through internal
and external marketing.” The
EDC’s Chief Executive Officer Survey of local businesses, as described
above, continues; a report to investors is expected in about two months. A
number of Estero businesses have already invested in the EDC.
The ECCL encourages Estero businesses to consider joining the EDC
to realize the benefits of being an investor and to support the economic
growth of south Lee County.
Those who are interested should contact the ECCL’s Bob Lienesch at
RPL1000@aol.com
or Christine Ross at
Director@BonitaEDC.com. For
more information on the BSEEDC, see
www.BonitaEDC.com.
Estero Parkway Wal-Mart Is Alive and Kicking
On
June 13th Wal-Mart presented its latest ideas for their store
on land they own on the northeast corner of US 41 and Estero Parkway to
the Estero Design Review Committee (EDRC). About 150 Estero residents
attended the hearing. Wal-Mart’s new plans call for an 180,000 square foot store including
space for general merchandise, a grocery store, a lawn and garden store,
a pharmacy with a drive-through but without a tire lube facility and one
outlot. The existing zoning for the property approved by the Board of
County Commissioners in October 2004 contains a 228,000 square foot
store with all the same uses but with a tire lube facility on the south
end of the building, no drug store and one 20,000 square foot outlot. The
existing zoning was the product of two years of negotiation between a
joint committee of the Estero Council of Community Leaders and The Vines
community, which at that time was the only abutting community that was
occupied. As a result the existing zoning contains twenty-four (24) site
development regulations that prescribe in detail the landscaping and
architecture of the development; the kind and location of sidewalks; the
walls surrounding all noise producing equipment, including delivery
areas; the hours of operation and delivery. In addition they prohibit
many of the practices that have made some Wal-Mart stores objectionable
like: the location of the outdoor seating; outdoor display and sales;
outdoor storage; overnight vehicle parking; construction blasting;
sidewalk, tent and parking lot sales; auto shows and other special
events and any temporary signage. The
members of the EDRC and the public had many suggestions for Wal-Mart and
its representatives. Wal-Mart wants some time to respond to all these
ideas, make the necessary adjustments and return to the EDRC. Once they
have firmed up the site plan and the design they plan to present to the
Estero Community Planning Panel (ECPP) before filing for rezoning with
the County. The community will have several more opportunities for input
on this project. Wal-Mart expects that the store will not open for
business for at least 22 months.
Corkscrew Woods Comprehensive Plan Approved by BOCC
On
June 18th, the Lee County Board of County Commissioners voted
to transmit the Corkscrew Woods Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the
Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. The 722 acre Corkscrew
Woods property, currently vested for 254 units, is inconsistent with the
one unit per 10 acres allowed within the DR/GR. Thus, when the
owner proposed changes through amendment to the Lee Plan, the
community’s primary objective was to find a land use strategy that would
create greater consistency with the intent of the DR/GR while
maintaining the integrity of the recently adopted DR/GR amendment. After
consideration of all of the possible options, the ECCL, Conservancy of
Southwest Florida and others decided that the best solution was to amend
relevant DR/GR sections of the Lee Plan to create an “Improved
Residential Communities” overlay with associated implementing policies
and map amendment. While the ECCL generally is opposed to
increases in density within areas such as the DR/GR, we believed that
this proposed amendment provides assurances that its applicability will
be limited properties satisfying specific restrictions, such as
requiring the site to already be inconsistent with the DR/GR standards
and be adjacent to lands designated as future urban areas. For
sites that qualify, increases in density are available only through a
rezoning to Residential Planned Development that demonstrates compliance
in meeting a series of meaningful environmental and conservation
standards. In addition, the actual increase in density can only be
gained through the applicant’s selection of, and commitment to,
environmentally beneficial criteria which they identify as part of their
rezone application. This results in three layers of
regulation which assure that any increase in density through this new
overlay will be balanced by significant net benefits to the environment. As
the utilization of TDRs was an integral part of the recently implemented
DR/GR program, the ECCL and others discussed with staff and the
applicant the need for any Lee Plan amendment to include the ability for
density increases on the Corkscrew Woods site to be achieved by
decreasing density elsewhere in the DR/GR. The proposed language,
as recommended by staff, contains such policy language and included:
·
The
ability for density to be gained through an applicant acquiring offsite
property within the DR/GR and extinguishing density on such land, and
·
Allowing the applicant to provide funds to Lee County to extinguish
density on other DR/GR parcels. Monetary payment to the County could be used as seed money for a future
County DR/GR TDR Bank, which was anticipated through the Lee Plan to be
part of the DR/GR TDR program. Such funds could be important in
launching the TDR program and establishing its viability as a mechanism
for transferring density. In addition, this money could also be
used to fund a panther crossing on Corkscrew Road, which has already
been permitted but does not have any allocated funds at this time.
Estero Community Planning Panel (ECPP) Expresses Concerns About the Horizon Council’s
Development Approval Recommendations
At the June 18th ECPP meeting, the panel members spent considerable time
going over each of the recent recommendations made by the Business
Issues Task Force of the Horizon Council that had been presented and
discussed by the Board of Commissioners on June 4th.
The
biggest concern the Panel has, by far, is the proposed restrictions on
the Community Plan Review Processes in Section V of the recommendations.
When Estero was the only planning panel in Lee County, the members
worked hard to ensure the both the ECPP and EDRC
members were technically qualified, properly chosen and appropriately
assigned to ensure a balanced approach to the review process. This has
taken years to achieve and the members and the community is proud of the
accomplishments of these groups. The Panel agrees that the review
process for both Zoning and Development Order approvals can be improved,
but we are in total disagreement that this can be accomplished by
removing any community review procedures and requirements for public
meetings. Both
groups have endeavored never to be a holdup to a developer -- if they
request a meeting for an administrative amendment the day after a
scheduled public meeting was held, the groups can (and often have)
reviewed them electronically and supported or responded to them within
two to three days of receiving the request. As has been stated many
times, community planning panels are NOT approval bodies. They cannot
block a developer from ignoring our concerns and proceed directly to the
Hearing Examiner.
Regarding the Rezoning Process recommendations, the ECPP has
strong reservations about the task force recommendations.
Although Estero is essentially free of Conventional Zoning Districts,
the Panel feels any Carte Blanche granting of zoning
changes anywhere in the County can be dangerous without restrictions or
certain thresholds. In addition the Panel is also very concerned about
loosening the requirements for administrative amendments. The ECPP and
the Estero Design Review Committee (EDRC) can accommodate developer
requests quickly and electronically for minor updates. The Panel has
done this frequently in the past without requiring a public meeting
unless there are concerns that may arise in neighboring residential
developments. Again, the words and phrases "reasonable" and "not
contrary to the public interest" and "do not have significant external
impacts" are certainly subject to interpretation. The ECPP would favor
erring on the safe side to provide a public forum to address such
amendments. With
regard to the concerns expressed about the expiration of Master Concept
Plans (MPC), the Panel is sympathetic to the development community when
a project lands in "zoning limbo" due to such expiration. However,
several examples were brought up at our meeting that might impact this
-- what if a road fails between the approval of a MCP and its
expiration? What if surrounding land uses have changed and would
conflict with approved uses? What about additional environmental
restrictions that become important? In general the Panel is
uncomfortable with having no expiration date for MCPs for many of the
reasons stated above. The panel is in general agreement with all of the Sufficiency Review
Process recommendations that are primarily process issues that can prove
burdensome depending on what actions the staff takes. These changes
require guidelines for the staff that applicants can understand. Among the Submittal Requirements recommendations, The ECPP questions
the need for not requiring narratives as part of a rezoning sufficiency
review and we do not agree with the point of not requiring upgrades for
minor improvements. Estero is justifiably proud of our buffering
and landscaping requirements and feel that they help make us a special
place in Lee County. Although these points are referred to as "being implemented
administratively", the ECPP cautions the County that this can be
dangerous depending on the staff interpretation of words such as
"minor", “reasonably possible”, "common sense" and "upgrade". Again, to
make these changes workable, the County Staff needs published guidelines
that applicants can understand and that are not left for interpretation. The
panel agrees that a uniform procedure for public presentations before
community planning panels should be established. They should be
developed by county staff. The
Estero groups are more than willing to participate in that process. A
developer should be able to know that wherever he goes in the County for
public review of a proposed development, the package he needs to bring
would be uniform and relatively simple. Estero Economic Development Task Force Pursues Economic Diversification StrategyThe
current recession has clearly demonstrated the need for southwest
Florida to diversify its economy. Lee County’s Economic Development
Office is committed to a long-term, forward-thinking mission that will
expand and diversify our local economy. The
ECCL has committed itself to assist Lee County Economic Development to
accomplish this mission by helping it create a
Catalyst Club. The members of the Catalyst Club are business
executives and professionals who have retirement homes in the area, are
frequent vacationers or have other kinds of connections to Lee County.
Bonita Springs and Estero are blessed to have many retired execs with
extensive knowledge of their industry and profession, many years of
insightful experience and many valuable relationships with key
decision-makers who can greatly assist the Lee County Economic
Development staff to attract new businesses and encourage the formation
of new businesses.
Recent Activities
The
Research and Enterprise Diamond
A
couple of years ago Lee County government decided that the area around
Southwest Florida International Airport (SRW) and just north of FGCU
offered its best opportunity for diversifying our economy which is now
heavily reliant on tourism. The area was called the Research Diamond but
that designation was not accorded any legal status, zoning overlay or
plan. As a
result Lee County staff asked the local chapter of the Urban Land
Institute (ULI) to create a Technical Assistance Panel of real estate
professionals to review the 40 square mile area now known as the
Research and Enterprise Diamond
(“Diamond”) and advise the County on three areas: Market Potential;
Planning and Design and Implementation Strategies. On February 24th
the ULI presented the County with a 22 page report that contained 8
recommendations the central one being that the County should “develop a
Strategic Master Plan for the Research and Enterprise Diamond by
convening all the major stakeholders in the area for a planning charette
facilitated by ULI Southwest Florida”. On
May 7th County staff made a presentation to the Board of
County Commissioners updating them on the Diamond and summarizing the
research staff had done with their Global Information System (GIS) to
develop layers of detailed information about the property in the
Research Diamond. However to date there has been no analysis of this
information as it relates to the Diamond area. On
May 29th several members of the Estero Economic Development
Task Force met with Glen Salyer who confirmed that he has been
designated by the County Manager to lead the Research and Enterprise
Diamond strategic planning effort. Salyer expects that the ULI will
assist in the implementation of one or more stakeholder workshops. He
also anticipates that there will be a number of committees formed to
deal with specific aspect of the strategic plan and that he would
welcome the participation of our Catalyst Club members. On
June 28th Salyer indicated that the County was still working
on the scope of work for the Strategic Planning project with the ULI to
determine who would be responsible for each element in that work plan.
In addition the County is trying to identify possible funding sources,
presumably including the $6.7 million remaining in the County’s Economic
Development Incentive Fund.
Innovation Economy
On
June 6th several members of the Economic Development Task
Force met with Tim Cartwright, President of the Gulf Coast Venture
Forum, who is developing a second Tamiami Angel Fund and is seeking Lee
County investors for that fund. The Gulf Coast Venture Forum is seeking
to create an Innovation Economy in southwest Florida that relies on two
of our underutilized assets:
- The private investment capital of the area’s many retired and
semi-retired successful entrepreneurs and business owners, and
- The intellectual capital of our experienced business retirees who
can mentor the area’s start-up entrepreneurs.
Cartwright suggested that we meet with Steve Walling, a founding Board
member of “Jump Start” who recently sold his firm and retired to
southwest Florida. Jump Start is a very successful entrepreneur support
organization located in Cleveland Ohio that has now been encouraged by
the Federal Government to facilitate adaption of its approach to other
communities throughout the country. On June 15th some members
of the Economic Development Task Force met with Walling to learn more
about Jump Start and how it might be adapted to southwest Florida.
Existing Alternate Energy Initiatives
On
June 5th three members of the Task Force met with Dr. Joseph
Simmons,
who just completed his first year in the "Backe Chair for Renewable
Energy" at the FGCU. His focus is on solar energy in particular but he
is very supportive of other renewable energy sources. He has a great
desire to stimulate energy research and related industrial energy
business in the Diamond area around the University. On June 29th Roger Strelow
and Don Eslick met with Paul Woods, CEO of Algenol,
an industrial biotech company
commercializing the use of hybrid algae to make ethanol & high value
organic green chemicals through carbon dioxide, water and sunlight. The
company employs nearly 100 scientists and engineers at their laboratory
just north of Alico Road, in the Research and Enterprise Diamond.
Earlier Efforts
During the “2011-12 season” the Estero Council of Community Leaders
(ECCL) Economic Development Committee and Lee County Economic
Development hosted ten “Catalyst Club Receptions” attended by over 110
Estero and Bonita Springs businesspersons. In
addition to presentations by Lee County Economic Development several of
the meetings also heard presentations by the Gulf Coast Venture Forum
that discussed how members could participate in “start up” investment
opportunities in Florida and especially southwest Florida. The
time commitment of most Catalyst Club members will be quite limited.
It’s not the members’ time that is needed; it’s their knowledge,
experience and relationships that are needed. From
time to time they will be invited to advise the County about business
attraction strategies appropriate for their industry or profession, how
best to work with a prospect in that industry that is considering Lee
County as a site for expansion or to see if the member has some business
relationships that may be useful in attracting a business to the area. Estero’s May Home Building Permits Hold Steady
During May, fifteen single family homes with a building value of $3.8
million were permitted in Estero. May’s
number of
Housing units permitted
was consistent with the figures for March and April, but the dollar value
this month picked up due to the issuance of larger value permits for two
new homes in West Bay. May’s
permits, excluding those for West Bay, were primarily for Lennar’s Bella
Terra, with the balance for Toll Brothers two developments, Belle Lago
and The Reserve of Estero.
On a year-to-date basis, 90% of the permits have been issued to Lennar
and Toll Brothers. Four
permits have been issued this year for the newest Estero community, The
Preserve at Corkscrew (see article above: “Homes Being Built and Lots
for Sale at The Preserve of Corkscrew”). The
following table compares year-to-date May figures with those of the
prior twelve years:
|
Year
|
Annual Total
Housing Units
|
Building
Value of Units
|
Average
Building Value Per Unit
|
Percentage
of Single Family Units
|
|
2000
|
858 |
$116,877,412 |
$136,221 |
38% |
|
2001
|
1,035
|
155,925,738 |
150,653 |
40 |
|
2002
|
599 |
99,942,722 |
166,849 |
52 |
|
2003
|
872 |
127,480,453 |
146,193 |
33 |
|
2004
|
631 |
126,737,869 |
200,852 |
72 |
|
2005
|
1,275 |
253,271,426 |
198,644 |
45 |
|
2006
|
702 |
164,942,772 |
234,961 |
24 |
|
2007
|
286 |
78,418,241 |
274,190 |
36 |
|
2008
|
56 |
19,730,130 |
352,324 |
80 |
|
2009
|
60 |
22,082,017 |
368,034 |
84 |
|
2010
|
97 |
17,999,000 |
185,557 |
75 |
|
2011
|
78 |
14,489,392 |
185,761 |
87 |
|
2012
|
95
|
17,145,867
|
180,483
|
90
|
Estero’s May Commercial Permits Include Another Large Investment
During May, permits totaling $1.8 million were issued for Estero
commercial buildings,
which included $1.5 million for clubhouse remodeling and a new facility
at Spring Run in The Brooks. As
shown in the following table, Estero’s commercial development peaked in
2006 with a total of $185 million.
After 2006, commercial investment in Estero fell precipitously
through 2010 and began to improve in 2011.
As shown below, the value of permits issued through the first
five months of 2012 is up significantly compared with the past few
years. This could suggest
that a modest rebound is in process.
|
Year
|
Year to Date
|
Annual Total
|
|
2000 |
$68,297,657 |
$77,250,835 |
|
2001 |
16,911,976 |
44,116,526 |
|
2002 |
5,968,501 |
23,135,139 |
|
2003 |
8,176,174 |
23,234,725 |
|
2004 |
8,661,787 |
60,859,820 |
|
2005 |
34,119,981 |
111,037,977 |
|
2006 |
74,470,848 |
184,709,240 |
|
2007 |
70,938,231 |
157,614,045 |
|
2008 |
21,989,153 |
39,261,677 |
|
2009 |
7,439,170 |
9,752,556 |
|
2010 |
1,211,381
|
9,322,546 |
|
2011 |
5,800,777 |
11,717,593 |
|
2012 |
7,663,878 |
? |
The major projects
permitted so far this year are: $1,500,000 for expanding and remodeling
Spring Run Country
Club;
$1,400,000 for remodeling
Shadow Wood Country Club;
$1,100,000 for various Coconut Point remodeling projects, and
$1,000,000 for a new Goodwill Industries facility. Note:
The building values above understate the cost of each residence or
commercial building because they exclude the value of the underlying
land. The
County permit information used in this report may be found at
http://www.lee-county.com/dcd/Reports/EsteroReports.htm
June Estero Single Family Home Sales Up; Year to Date Sales Flat
Multiple Listing Service (MLS) figures indicate that 32 single family
homes in Estero were sold in June.
As shown below, this represents a 14% increase from a year ago,
but 5 less than were sold in May.
On a year-to-date basis, sales total 209, about the same as last
year through June.
|
Period
|
Sold in 2011
|
Sold in 2012
|
Inc (Dec)
|
Inc (Dec) %
|
|
Jan
|
23
|
58
|
35
|
152%
|
|
Feb
|
45
|
21
|
(24)
|
-53
|
|
Mar
|
39
|
32
|
(7)
|
-18
|
|
Qtr 1
|
107
|
111
|
4
|
4
|
|
Apr
|
50
|
29
|
11
|
-42
|
|
May
|
27
|
37
|
10
|
37
|
|
June
|
28
|
32
|
4
|
14
|
|
Qtr 2
|
105
|
98
|
-7
|
-7
|
|
YTD
|
212
|
209
|
-3
|
-1
|
|
July
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
Aug
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
Sept
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
Qtr 3
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
YTD
|
293
|
|
|
|
|
Oct
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
Nov
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
Dec
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
Qtr 4
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
354
|
|
|
|
As of
June 30, 2012, there were 355 listings of currently active unsold single
family homes in Estero. This
is about the same as the beginning of the year, and 25 less (6%) than a
year ago.
Of
the 355 active listings, about 20% represent “distressed sales,” i.e.,
short-sale listings or bank owned properties which, in each case, the
bank is expected to receive less than its loan amount.
This percent is about the same as last month. Based
on sales in recent months, 355 active listings represent a 12 month
supply of unsold homes, about the same as a the beginning of the year.
A six month supply typically indicates a good market. Thanks again to Joe Pavich, Sr. of Realty World in Estero for compiling
these figures for the ECCL. Note:
These amounts include most of Estero, but do not include the Estero
portion of Pelican Landing, which is not separately listed in the MLS.
Also, none of the above amounts include listings of multi-family
homes. |