To learn more about Estero and its growth management efforts
view the website of:
Estero Community Planning Panel (ECPP);
Estero Civic Association (ECA);
Estero Design Review Committee (EDRC), and
Estero Council of Community Leaders (ECCL)
www.esterofl.org
The site is still in formation.…
Your suggestions for improvement are most welcome.
At their March meeting the Estero Council of Community Leaders (ECCL)
approved sending a letter to the Mayor and all six Council members of the City
of Bonita Springs encouraging the two communities to work together to promote
better communication among neighbors and to collaborate in solving common
problems. Jack Lienesch, an ECCL member from
Pelican Landing, agreed to serve as
liaison for the ECCL and to make the initial contact with the Mayor and each of
the Council members.
At the April 5th meeting of the Bonita City Council the ECCL letter was
discussed favorably and some of the Council members suggested that Councilman
John Joyce might serve as Liaison to the ECCL and the Estero community
leadership. At its April 19th meeting the Bonita City Council voted to designate
Councilman Joyce as liaison to the Estero community leadership group. Since then
Councilman Joyce, Mr. Lienesch and representatives of the Estero Community
organizations had a productive meeting discussing how best to proceed to develop
the relationship and to identify what issues the two communities might work on
together.
On April 8th about
500 people attended Estero’s first exhibition of
the arts in the Estero Ballroom and Foyer at the Coconut Point Hyatt Resort. The
following ten organizations manned booths providing participants with
information about their programs, facilities and membership opportunities:
Several groups reported that they had recruited more than one hundred new
members and gained exposure to many, many more Estero and south Lee residents.
In addition the participants were treated to nearly three hours of top
quality entertainment, all provided by the Estero oriented arts organizations.
The crowd was awed by two teenage phenoms, Alexandra Tocco, a vocalist
representing Gulfshore Playhouse, and Crawford Wiley, a nationally renowned
classical pianist from Estero. Other groups making presentations were the Estero
Historical Society, Friends of the South County Regional Library, Inc. and Spirit of the Gulf.
The event would not have been possible without major contributions by
Colonial Bank and the Hyatt Coconut Point Resort.
On April 7th architectural plans for
Gulfshore
Playhouse were unveiled at a major fundraiser featuring Anna Maria Alberghetti.
When completed Gulfshore Playhouse will contain a 550 seat main stage, a 150
seat studio theater, a learning institute, rehearsal space, offices, design
shops and dressing rooms. The theater is planned as part of the “Estero on the
River” project which is located between US 41 and Sandy Lane along the north
side of Corkscrew Road. Land for the Theater has been donated by the developer
of that property, JED Development.
This controversy just doesn’t want to
go away. After being turned down twice by the Metropolitan Planning Organization
(MPO), the road planning agency for Lee County and all its municipalities, at
its March meeting the MPO Board voted 11 to 4 to approve accepting the $10
million designated by the 2005 Federal transportation authorization bill for the
Coconut I-75 Interchange. After Comm. Judah had proposed a compromise that would
have authorized a study of a west-only Interchange somewhere between Bonita
Beach Road and Corkscrew Road, Mayor Carla Johnston of the City of Sanibel moved
that the money and the study be accepted subject to seven conditions. The most
significant conditions contained in the approved motion are:
That this vote is not a commitment to the interchange, but a commitment to
a study for looking at the transportation needs in that area,
There should be an environmental component that should be given special
emphasis to ensure protection for the already protected DRGR and related areas
important for water supply, habitat preservation, as well as air quality. This
component of the work should not be done by highway planners, but by people with
appropriate expertise,
That no dollars be committed for the design or construction of projects
associated with this study that are outside the earmarked $10 million in order
to protect the integrity of the projects already in the MPO’s 2030 Plan,
That there be frequent input from the MPO on the IJR (Interstate Justification
Report) project as well as the PD&E project.
Subsequent to March 17th MPO meeting members of the ECCL Transportation
Committee and several leaders of regional environmental organizations met with
MPO and FDOT staffs to discuss how and when they planned to satisfy these
conditions. We were informed that FDOT would begin the process of advancing the
funds necessary to begin the Interchange Justification Report study by year end.
The basic requirements for such a study are prescribed by the Federal Highway
Administration and by an FDOT Handbook and other documents that implement the
Federal requirements. FDOT indicated that the environmental part of the study
would be implemented as part of the PD&E study that would follow if the
Interchange were found to be justified. They further indicated that the
Efficient Transportation Decision Making (ETDM) tool, which would be implemented
while the IJR was underway, would provide some environmental results prior to
the interchange justification decision by the Federal Highway Administration.
ETDM is a tool whereby various agencies can raise concerns based upon a brief
description of the project and its location. It is not clear if this information
is available to and used by the Federal Highway Administration in making its
Interchange decisions.
In early April the Fort Myers News Press reported on an engineering study
prepared for Edison Farms, the owners of 2,500 acres just east of I-75 at this
location that concluded that 8,300 homes could be constructed on this property
without impairing the wetlands on the site, up for the 250 homes that present
zoning would permit. In response to this information Comm. Judah asked that the
MPO add an agenda item to its April meeting to consider adding the traffic
impact of this development to the IJR study. MPO staff agreed to add the item to
the agenda.
At the April 21st meeting of the MPO members of the ECCL Transportation
Committee and leaders of the region’s environmental community were able to
present our concerns about MPO and FDOT staffs’ approach to satisfying the seven
conditions of Mayor Johnston’s motion approving the interchange study. After
considerable discussion, the MPO voted unanimously to ask staff to present at
the May MPO meeting a detailed schedule/chart that would lay out the time frame
when all the elements of the motion, including the environmental component,
would be undertaken and satisfied.
On April 4th FDOT hosted a public
meeting to display and discuss their plans for six-laning US 41 from Corkscrew
north to San Carlos Park. FDOT staff states that this segment will be ready for
construction during the first quarter 2007 if it is able to acquire two acres of
land along the route for a detention pond from the owner of the land, Lee
County. The State’s preference for the needed detention pond is on the southwest
corner of Broadway and US 41 (the former Boomer property). The problem is that
the County bought this land using funds from its “Conservation 2020” program.
That program prohibits use of land acquired with these funds from being used for
such a pond. Thus FDOT is considering condemning the land from the County. If
this is a “friendly” suit the FDOT is likely to be able to obtain the land in
time for a spring 2007 construction start.
At present FDOT has budgeting funding for this project in its 2010-11 fiscal
year, three years after it will be ready for construction. Unbelievably, in each
of the last two years FDOT has amended its budget to delay funding this much
needed project by one year each time. These delays have increased the
difficultly of the most likely financial plan for advancing the construction of
the segment by three years to 2007. For three year Lee County DOT and FDOT have
been discussing the idea that Lee County would use its low interest loan fund to
borrow the necessary funds, now $25 million, and loan them to FDOT so that the
road could be accelerated, with the interest on the loan being paid by Wal-Mart
and other aspiring developers along the segment. Since the loan is repaid using
the funds FDOT has budgeted for widening the road, every budget delay increases
the amount of interest that must be paid by the developers, thus reducing the
likelihood that such a proposal will succeed.
The latest suggestion would have Lee County build the segment for FDOT thus
reducing the size of the borrowing. Under FDOT rules for state construction of
the road all $25 million must be available before construction can begin. Lee
County does not have such a requirement. Thus, if Lee County builds the road not
all the $25 million needs to borrowed so soon, thus reducing the borrowing and
the interest cost.
The final State/County financing issue concerns who will pay for any cost
overrun on the project, should one occur. FDOT contends that, under its rules,
it cannot pay more than is in its budget for constructing the road in 2010. Thus
FDOT will not accept responsibility for any costs above the budget amount if the
County builds the road for them three years earlier than they could build it.
Naturally the County does not want to accept this responsibility inasmuch as US
41 is a state road….its completion is a state responsibility. The two
governments must resolve these issues soon so that construction of this
bottleneck can be broken starting next spring.
Early in April Lee DOT announced that their latest
estimate of the cost of constructing the
Estero Parkway Flyover from Ben Hill
Griffin to Three Oaks Parkway had increased by $17.5 million, from $31 million
to $48.5 million, an incredible 56% increase in one year. As a result Lee DOT
staff is recommending that the start of construction of this vital reliever for
the Corkscrew I-75 Interchange will be delayed from this summer to late next
year.
As anyone who travels in Estero knows traffic around the I-75 Corkscrew Road
Interchange is already congested and dangerous. With the opening of the
International Design Center, the
Coconut Point Town Center and many other
businesses in the area these conditions are likely to get far worse before the
Estero Parkway flyover is completed. The County needs to review all its funding
alternatives to find a way to begin this badly needed project on its earlier
schedule later this summer so that it can be completed prior to the 2007-08
“season”.
Landscaping the median midway between US 41 and Three Oaks
Parkway has been held up pending completion of the model homes in
The Reserve at
Estero so that they can replace the development’s temporary sales office. During
April Toll Brothers closed the sales office and began to remove it from the
property, thus eliminating the need for the median cut by its entrance. Toll
Brothers has notified the contractor to schedule closing this median and expects
the median closure to be completed in about 30 days. Once the median has been
closed the second and final phase of the median landscaping program can be
installed under the existing contact.
The project has been long delayed because of new State rules limiting the
size of trees planted in the median of roads that are designed for 50 miles per
hour or more. The County appealed these provisions several times to no avail. In
addition, however, the County decided to supplemental state funding for the
project, thus allowing a significantly different look for this segment of Lee
County roadways.
The County’s intensified core landscaping program consists of large trees and
sod, like those installed along Corkscrew Road. In contrast, this segment of US
41 will be characterized by smaller, multi-trunk trees surrounded by low growing
shrubs and groundcover. Finally, the design will include faux-finished bricks
around the intersections instead of the usual cement.
Now that the design has been completed and the bidding process has begun
landscape installation should begin sometime this summer and be completed about
the time that the Coconut Point Town Center opens for business the fall.
The
Lee County Sheriff’s Department
is
considering locating its south Lee County Headquarters on five acres now owned
by the County immediately adjacent to the South County Regional Library on the
west side of Three Oaks Parkway just north of Corkscrew Road. In order to
shorten the facility’s construction time the Sheriff is considering the use of
an 8,000 square foot modular building to house the 61 employees who will serve
this area. It would appear from aerial photographs of the site that the entrance
would be north of the Library with the building constructed west of the Library.
The proposal must be approved by the BOCC before it can be started.
This proposal would not eliminate the small Sheriff’s office now planned to
open this fall in the Coconut Point Town Center
near the Muvico Theater and
close to the middle of the Town Center.
Press reports
indicate that the US Postal Service
is considering a small, 300 square foot,
post office in the Coconut Point Town Center. The Post Office would lease and
operate the facility that is now in the planning stages. The Post Office has not
yet leased any property for the facility.
This facility would not eliminate the need for a full post office for Estero.
The U.S. Post Office’s plans for this facility have now been approved by the
regional office and are now in Washington for final approval. The regional
office cannot estimate when final approval will be forthcoming.
During March a total of 404
housing units were permitted in Estero with a
building value of $82.3 million. Of that total 207 units with a building value
of $45.2 million will be constructed in the
Residences of Coconut Point and 132
with a building value of $19 million will be constructed in
Rapallo. This
explosion increases Estero’s first quarter totals to 569 housing units and a
total building value of $119.7 million.
The following table shows how the first quarter of 2006 compares with the
same period during the prior six years:
Year
Total January Housing Units
Building Value of Units
Average Building Value Per Unit
Percentage of Single Family Units
2000
506
$68,142,696
$134,669
40.5
2001
584
$88,114,145
$150,880
42.5
2002
292
$55,956,255
$191,631
59.6
2003
532
$77,905,904
$146,440
32.0
2004
371
$74,011,015
$199,491
72.5
2005
883
$168,168,623
$190,451
37.5
2006
569
$119,676,682
$210,328
14.9
As the above table shows, the first quarter of 2006 ranks third in number of
permitted housing units and second in total building value during this seven
year period. The 2006 average building value is the considerably higher than any
other year in spite of it’s small percentage (14.9%) of single family homes.
The value of commercial buildings permitted in Estero during the first
quarter of 2006 totaled $68.4 million. The 2006 total is more than 5 times the
second highest first quarter commercial permit building value, $12.7 million,
recorded in 2001. The major projects that contributed to the 2006 total are:
On September 12, 2005 the developers of
Estero
Crossing CPD presented their plans for this large retail site on the south side
of Corkscrew Road just west of the Island Club and
Corkscrew Woodlands
residential communities and immediately east of
Estero Town Commons. The
developers are Boston based JTAD Estero LLC. Their plan for the 41.74 acre site
provides for a maximum of 310,000 square feet of gross floor area of retail
space.
Two areas for smaller buildings (maximum 62,000 square feet) would be up
front along Corkscrew Road with parking in the rear; this area is called the
Village Square. The larger stores would be in the rear of the property and could
include two big box stores.
On April 6th the developers presented their development to the Lee County
Hearing Examiner. The County staff report recommended that “approval of local
development order(s) for vertical commercial development on this site are tied
to the construction of Estero Parkway extension or as an alternative, to a
capacity improvement on Corkscrew Road from Three Oaks Parkway to I-75.” This is
similar to the provision that was imposed upon Wal-Mart a couple of years ago
when it sought zoning approval for the store it plans to build at US 41 and
Estero Parkway. The attorney representing the developers asked the Hearing
Examiner to except the Village Square part of the project from this limitation.
The Hearing Examiner indicated an interest in the recommended condition, but did
express concern about these limitations being imposed upon developers by the
County Board in an inconsistent manner.
The neighbors from Corkscrew Woodlands and the Island Club spoke in support
of the development because they are satisfied with the buffering along their
property and because the project will permit them a better west bound access to
Corkscrew Road by using an access road through Estero Crossings and Estero Town
Commons, the next commercial development to the west.
On April 10th the ECPP and about 75 Estero residents
heard a proposal for a second Estero Palms residential development on Block Lane
west of River Ranch Road. Sean Weeks of SRW Engineering presented two
possibilities for development by Estero Palms II. The first proposes 32 single
family homes on ten acres; the second proposes 48 single family homes on 15
acres with the addition of five adjacent acres.
Taylor Woodrow, a major housing developer, recently purchased Estero Palms
and has begun an aggressive advertising program. Site work including a large
lake in the middle of the property and two model homes had been completed by the
original developers of this site.
The developer’s representative said that a traffic impact study had not yet
been completed but one is scheduled for the property. Residents of nearby homes
to the north raised questions about the distance between these two story homes
and their homes and the adequacy of the buffering between their properties.
Noethlich reminded the residents of their opportunities to question and
challenge provisions of the proposal during the upcoming County review process.
The developers distributed their business cards and assured the Panel that they
would make themselves available to meet with residents who may consider their
properties to be affected by the proposed development.
At the April 10th ECPP meeting
the developers of this 85 acre proposed mixed-use development at the northeast
corner of US 41 and Corkscrew Road presented an informational update from the
original presentation of March, 2005.
The developer’s representative stated that questions raised during the
earlier presentation have been addressed in the interim. The proposed
development would now contain 530 single and multi-family residential units,
approximately 34,500 square feet of medical office space, 52,500 square feet of
general office space, 177,000 square feet of retail space including a 100 room
“boutique” hotel and 36,000 square feet of “civic” space designated to be the
site of Gulfshore Playhouse.
The following changes have been made in the development plan:
The design of the main north-south street was changed in order to discourage
use of the site as a shortcut for traffic attempting to avoid the intersection
of east bound Corkscrew and northbound US 41.
Answering earlier questions about the proposed development’s treatment of
Estero River which flows through the property, the developer indicated that the
river would be available for public access with restoration planned for each
side of the river and no development allowed directly on the river.
Several existing historic buildings on the site would be transferred to new
locations and several structures approximately 40 to 50 years old that are not
considered of historic significance would be removed. In addition four
structures of historic interest would remain on the site.
The development would “internalize” building height with its shortest
buildings being located near the perimeter of the property and its tallest
buildings of 60 feet located near the center of the property.
Questions raised by the Panel included:
It was noted that a total of 300,000 square feet of commercial space on 17
acres amounts to a higher density than normal. The developer indicated that this
was done to accommodate mixed use development and to add additional green space
on the property.
Would the development contain public gathering areas to encourage pedestrian
use of the property? The developer said that the area along the river would be a
linear park with preservation, restoration and walkways.
Asked for the width of preserved lands along the Estero River? The developer
stated that 50 foot buffers would be established on each side of the river,
creating the linear park for the general public to enjoy.
Asked about the “shared parking” concept which the developer indicated would
be employed? Would the parking area of Gulfshore Playhouse, generally vacant
during the daytime, be available for office and retail parking during the day?
How would the boating public be accommodated in the development? The developer
indicated that consideration would be given to that aspect of the development
when detailed planning was begun.
The Panel stated that the development would be an ideal site for some true
mixed use development and such a plan would be supported by the Panel.
Asked if the development’s calculations include the possible realignment of
Sandy Lane? The developer replied that it would not greatly affect the plans.
Georgia Nelson of the Estero Historical Society questioned the Mediterranean
style of design proposed for the community while itemizing the various
structures of historical value on the property.
The developers representative indicated that the developer had committed to
Lee County that they would advance up to $1,000,000 to expedite the widening of
US 41adjacent to the west side of the proposed development.
Also on April 10th the ECPP
and the community heard a presentation by Newport Bay Corporation, the
developers of Montecristo, of their revised plans for this development, an 820
residence golf course community proposed for the south side of Corkscrew Road
adjacent to the east side of Wildcat Run. The developer’s original proposal for
this land included 150,000 square feet of commercial space but this was
eliminated after extensive discussions with their neighbors to the west in
Wildcat Run.
The revised plan call for 130 single family homes and 690 multi-family
residences in buildings of four, six, eight, twelve and eighteen units. Sixty
percent (60%) of the total site is designated for preserve for an existing
floway and wildlife habitat passageway. The proposal includes two gated access
points, its main entrance on Corkscrew Road and a secondary point connecting to
Wildcat Run. The developers indicated that the purpose of this design is to
provide both Montecristo and Wildcat Run with a common exit from the area to
Corkscrew Road, thus increasing the likelihood of a traffic signal at that
intersection. The Panel complimented the developer for creating a plan that
eliminated the commercial uses and located the buildings so as to preserve the
floways and wildlife areas.
On April 10th representatives of the developers
of Midtowne Estero Village returned to the ECPP for their second presentation
regarding this property. They had presented their conceptual plans to the Panel
in July, 2005.
Representatives of Ascot Development, the developers of Midtowne Estero
Village and Midtowne Estero MPD across Three Oaks Parkway, presented a
preliminary proposal for the 33.5 acre site located on the east side of Three
Oaks Parkway approximately 1,400 feet south of Corkscrew Road. As proposed the
development would contain 249 residences in 17 buildings of up to 16 units per
building with none higher than two stories. The residential units are densely
configured because almost 10 acres is devoted to Estero River buffer areas and
adjacent indigenous preserves. Several concerns were raised about the
development’s buffering from adjacent commercial developments.
On April 10th Ned Dewhirst of Oakbrook
Development, the overall developers of Coconut Point, made another presentation
to the EDRC. He indicated that Coconut Point monument signs will be located
along US 41 at Williams Road and Coconut Road and at the corner by the Sanibel
Steakhouse. Coconut Point wall entry signs will be located at Williams Road and
Sandy Lane, at the Rapallo entry, on US 41 by the
Estero Fire Rescue station and
at the Pelican Colony boulevard entrance.
Representatives of Flood Properties LLC also presented their plans for a 224
unit multi-family development called “Mirasol at Coconut Point” to be located
between Via Coconut Point (formerly Sandy Lane) and the railroad tracks from
Coconut Road on the north to the Bonita Springs border on the south. The units
will consist of condominiums, town-homes and flats with from one to three
bedrooms, a one-car attached garage and average 1,300 square feet in size. The
development will include 28 two-story buildings and a clubhouse and a pool. Most
buildings will contain 8 units but a few will have 6 or 10 units. Mirasol will
be a gated community. The sales center should be open in early May. Unit prices
will range from the high $200,000’s to the low $400,000’s.
The Committee expressed the opinion that the architecture was not comparable
with the rest of Coconut Point. The applicants’ indicated the renderings make
the architecture difficult to appreciate but that it is comparable to
Rapallo.
The EDRC expressed a desire to see a landscape plan for the project. The
driveways will use brick pavers. The application failed to show any rear
elevations. The developers agreed to return with a landscape plan and building
perspectives at the next EDRC meeting.
There will be low ground cover between the driveways. The Committee suggested
using a half finger between drives with waist-high shrubs. Interior street
lighting will use decorative poles. The developer agreed that there would be a
wall on the east side of the development along the railroad tracks and
Spring
Run.
During April the first two stores opened in the
Coconut Point Town Center.
They are large stores located in The Market area which rims the north end of the
Town Center. The stores opening in April were Old Navy and Sports Authority.
Other “Market” stores planning on opening this summer include:
May 15…Bed Bath & Beyond
May 21…TJMaxx
June 17…PetSmart
July 14…Best Buy
There have been many complaints from throughout the community and at the
April EDRC meeting about the small, atypical plants, bushes and trees being
installed in the berm along US 41 and in the parking lots in the Coconut Point
Market area. Much smaller and different material is being planted here as
compared to the northern sections of Coconut Point. Inasmuch as the
Coconut
Point Appearance Standards approved by Lee County apply to the entire project,
questions were asked as to why the easily observable difference.
As a result several members of the EDRC and from the surrounding communities
met with representatives of the Simon Development Group to discuss this problem.
Simon promised to provide the EDRC members with copies of the approved landscape
plans for the development for their review and comment. As we go to press those
plans have just arrived.
On April 12th the developers of the
Estero Animal
Hospital returned to the EDRC with their revised plans for this facility to be
located on the south side of Corkscrew Road just west of River Ranch Road. When
the project was first presented to the EDRC in October 2005 the Committee
generally liked the development but suggested that its Old Florida design was
not compatible with the Mediterranean developments that surround it as required
by the Corkscrew Road Overlay provisions of the Lee Land Development Code.
The project as presented now is essentially unchanged but for its new
Mediterranean design. The Committee discussed the need for a wall between the
Animal Hospital and an adjacent home that is being sold for use as commercial
property. The Committee indicated that it would support elimination of the wall
if the owners could obtain assurances that the home would be demolished and the
property rezoned as commercial. The Committee also requested that the signage be
channel lit rather than using internal illumination. The developer agreed to
discuss this possibility with his signage supplier and to send revised plans to
the Committee.
On April 3rd the foreclosure sale of this
property was cancelled by the Lee County Circuit Judge handling the case after
the owners filed for reorganization under the provisions of Chapter 11 of the
Federal Bankruptcy law. Thus the case will be transferred to the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Middle District of Florida.
This property is located just north of the Coconut Point Hyatt at the west
end of Coconut Road. It has long been used for commercial fishing and providing
public access boat storage and launching.
On February 14th the BOCC asked staff to explore the possibility of the
County purchasing the former Weeks Fish Camp property. In March County staff
recommended against acquisition by the County because of the high price and the
limitations placed upon naval use of the site by Federal regulatory agencies.
Staff indicated to representatives of several communities around the site that
they would consider recommending to the BOCC County participation with a private
developer of the site in order to maintain some public boat access to Estero Bay
from the property. Presently Lee County has fifteen public boat ramps.